I’m hooked (Topic Discussion Podcast)

♪♪ Intro music plays ♪♪ Hello and welcome to another Tabletop Games Blog topic discussion. I’m hooked Hook, as per the dictionary definition, is
something that draws you in. In games a
hook can be number of different things. Often it is something visually exciting, such as beautiful illustrations, amazingly detailed miniatures, realistic resources or some sort of physical
component, that is integral to gameplay. Hooks can also be an interesting theme, an exciting gameplay, mechanism or even the background story behind how a game was made. Certain awards or even the price of
the game can be a hook too. Ultimately, it’s about finding something that grabs your attention and gets you to take a closer look. Some of the physical hooks in tabletop games I can think of include the gears in Tzolk’in by Czech Games Edition, the marble dispenser in Gizmos by CMON, and the cardboard tree in Everdell by Starling Games. These are probably components that most people will know, even if they have never played those games. Physical components are a big draw for
a lot of people, of course. They really
enhance the table presence of the game. They are tactile as well, adding another level to playing a game. Miniatures and realistic resources are
another two groups of physical hooks. Miniatures in particular have become
very popular recently. They not only give the game an enhanced visual
presence, but they also have an overlap with
another hobby: miniature painting. So if you’re a tabletop wargamer, then
games like Rising Sun by CMON, or or Dwellings of Eldervale by Breaking
Games are likely to appeal to you too, and if you enjoy painting your war game
miniatures, then board game miniature
painting should keep you busy too. Illustrations are also great hooks in games, and many recently released games look absolutely stunning. My favourite example is Scythe by
Stonemaier Games, where Jakub Rozalski
has created a whole alternative world, which is not only used as a backdrop for the game, but also an integral part of the theme, and
theme can, of course, be another hook for games. There are more non-physical hooks such as the augmented reality app in Chronicles of Crime by
Lucky Duck Games. And there are many more different
things that will get your attention, make you look at a game more
closely and get you excited. The list is very long indeed and I really
only wanted to offer some examples. A lot of hooks are an integral part of gameplay, but there are games where they are just gimmicks, or novelties, that make the game stand out from the rest, but aren’t actually needed to play the game, even though they often enhance the enjoyment of game from an aesthetic perspective, of
course, which in itself can be enough. I don’t want to pick on a specific game, but let me use the tree in Everdell as an
example to illustrate where I think a hook
has become nothing else than a novelty. The tree doesn’t provide anything that you need to play the game. In fact, the tree uses up a lot of space and there have been many complains that in a four-player game the tree actually becomes an annoying obstruction for one of the players, or forces everyone to sit
closer together to leave room for the tree. However, it does look amazing and really adds to the atmosphere of the game. It does create an impressive table presence. The marble dispenser in Gizmos is
another example of a gimmick, even though I’d argue that
it actually serves a purpose. You could easily replace the dispenser with a bag and simply draw the relevant number of marbles by hand and line them up on a rack. However, the dispenser is great because it automatically refills the marbles as they are taken, removing the need for you to draw new ones or
to have to remember to draw new ones, allowing you to focus on the game. So to me, it’s maybe not integral to gameplay, but certainly makes things more convenient for players. I think most will agree that the gears
in Tzolk’in are not a gimmick. I would say they were innovative at the time, even though you could argue that would probably possible to create the same mechanism by other means, but in reality, having to keep track of where things are on the cogs and keeping everything in sync without the gears would’ve put more pressure on players and created unnecessary housekeeping, that would have seriously distracted from gameplay. So even if you don’t think they were innovative
they certainly aren’t just a gimmick. When we look at the other end of a game’s lifecycle then we’ll find that game designers
sometimes start the design with a hook. They may have had a great idea for
something that would create interest and
then go from there to create a game. They add mechanisms and theme and everything
else by using the hook as a starting point. Like with all game design that is absolutely fine.
Game design can start in different ways. Sometimes a mechanism is the basis for games, sometimes it’s a theme, sometimes an interesting component, or a mix of different things. However, there have been games where the hook was too heavily relied on to make the game fun and it just didn’t work. Mechanisms, balance, art, theme –
everything matter too. I would argue that mechanisms and theme are the two most important parts of a good game, but it doesn’t really matter, because ultimately a great hook alone is not going to make for a great game. There’s also a lot more that is needed to make me want to play again, again and again and again – and enjoy it. On the flip side, a game without a hook will find it hard to stand out in the deluge of games being released these days. It is almost in the definition of the term. If there is nothing about a game that attracts
attention then nobody will look at it, which means nobody will buy it. However, something that’s a great hook for
one person may be a turn-off for another. As I said before, someone might be
drawn in by stunning artwork, other people might be looking for a game with a new mechanism, others might swear by certain themes or IP in games. We are all different and have different expectations. What does a hook for you, when it comes to tabletop games? Do you care much about hooks? What game did you buy because of a great hook,
but then was disappointed when you got to play it? Was there a game that had no specific hook, but had something else that made you really enjoy it? Please share your thoughts in the comments
of the blog’s article, links in description, or on the Apple Podcasts,
if you’re using that, or other systems. I’d love to hear what other people are looking for in games and how hooked you might get on hooks. Thank you very much for listening to this Tabletop Games Blog topic discussion. There is a written version of it on the blog.
Please see the link in the description below. There you’ll also find links to my Ko-Fi and Patreon pages, if you want to support me financially. Please also look at my Twitter feed and generally
pass around the word of this blog and this podcast. I’d really appreciate it.
The more people know the better. If you are on Apple podcasts, please also leave a review and leave some stars, but other than that, thanks very much for listening
and I hope to see you again soon. This podcast was made possible by my Patreon supporters David Miller of subQuark Publishing, James Naylor of Naylor Games, Paul Grogan of Gaming Rules, Robin Kay of Ruined Sky Games, Sarah Reed of Undine Studios, Tim Virnig and Richard Simpson of We’re Not Wizards.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *